Photo by Niamh Redmond (view ‘WHAT IF’ set on Flickr)

I attended the advance/ member preview of the new Science Gallery exhibit yesterday evening – ‘What If…’.  The exhibition investigates where design meets science to explore the weird, wonderful and sometimes scary possibilities for future technology. The exhibition is curated by leading London based design duo Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby (www.dunneandraby.co.uk).

The project features some very visual and interesting design works, produced by twenty designers from around the world, as well as a range of thought-provoking questions. The exhibition is interesting to me on a number of levels. Firstly, as an interaction designer/ practitioner and interactive media professional, I was familiar with Dunne and Raby’s work – specifically their “Technological Dream Series: Number 1, Robots (2007)” piece. Dunne & Raby both spoke at the opening of the exhibition. The pair use design as a medium to stimulate discussion and debate amongst designers, industry and the public about the social, cultural and ethical implications of existing and emerging technologies. They use interaction design to ask questions rather than to solve problems. Their designs provoke people to consider implications and not necessarily applications – “critical design.”

Anthony Dunne is the head of the Design Interactions department at the Royal College of Art in London and was recently awarded the Sir Misha Black Award for Innovation in Design Education in 2009. He previously studied Industrial Design and completed a PhD in Computer Related Design. Fiona Raby was a founding member of the CRD Research Studio where she worked as a Senior Research Fellow leading externally funded research projects, and she taught in Architecture for over 10 years before teaching in Design Interactions. Dunne’s and Raby’s professional and academic backgrounds are evident in the exhibition. While certainly provocative (read the “Greyhounds are not medical devices. Don’t let this happen” article on Indymedia) but not quite shocking, Dunne and Raby do succeed in getting people to question possible decisions society might have to make in the future if/ when science and technology meet design in more extreme ways. Gallery director Michael John Gorman said in an article in the Irish Independent that the exhibit examines “possible future scenarios through products you might buy in the future.”

I particularly liked the following works:

WHAT IF…Our emotions were read by machines? - Belief Systems, 2009 by Bernhard Hopfengärtner

“Facial micro-expressions last less than a second and are almost impossible to control. They are hard wired to the emotional activity in the brain which can be easily captured using specially developed technological devices. Free will is now in question as science exposes decision-making as an emotional process rather than a rational one.This ability to read emotions technologically could result in a society obsessed with emotional reactions. Emotions, convictions and beliefs, which usually remain hidden, now become a public matter. ‘Belief systems’ is a video scenario about a society that responds to the challenges of modern neuroscience by embracing these technological possibilities to read, evaluate and alter people’s behaviours and emotions.” Twitter hashtag: #beliefSG

WHAT IF… Probability could be 100% guaranteed? – Coin Flipper, 2009 by Dot Samsen
“We often use randomness and fate to help us make decisions. Some decisions are so hard to make that we leave the responsibility completely to fate or randomness-by flipping a coin. This can make us feel less guilty or believe we’ve reached the ‘right’ decision, but what are our true intentions behind these decisions? The Coin Flipper aims to challenge this apparent randomness to reveal our true intentions.” Twitter hashtag: #coinSG

WHAT IF… We could modify clouds to snow ice cream? – The Cloud Project, 2009 by Zoe Papadopoulou & Cathrine Kramer
“Developments in nanotechnology and planetary scale engineering point to new possibilities for us to conform the global environment to our needs. These advances combined with a dream to make clouds snow ice cream inspired a series of experiments that look at ways to alter the composition of clouds to make new and delicious sensory experiences. Using ice cream as a catalyst for dialogue, the project’s focus is to welcome people into a nano ice cream van and allow new audiences to experience and imagine emerging scientific developments and their consequences. The nano ice cream van will visit Science Gallery from 12th November-4th December 2009.” Twitter hashtag:#icecreamSG

WHAT IF… We had to rent trees to offset our carbon footprint? – BuyProduct, 2009 by Dot Samsen
“Carbon credit brings the ‘convenience’ back to the ‘inconvenient truth’. Global warming has been driven by capitalism. Now we are trying to solve global warming through capitalism. Is this possible? From an ecological perspective, CO2 is a by-product of the living, either directly or indirectly. From the economic perspective, CO2 may become the world’s largest commodity market. What do we consider the price of our own by-products? This project aims to criticize the carbon trading system as well as raise awareness of how good we are at destroying the planet.” Twitter hashtag: #treeSG

WHAT IF… We tried to make a toaster from scratch? – The Toaster Project, 2009 by Thomas Thwaites
“Thwaites went on a quest to build an electric toaster from scratch, seeking iron, copper, mica, nickel and crude oil (for the plastic case) from disused mines in Britain, then attempting to process the materials at home. This nine-month process to make a simple toaster is absurd, but so too is the massive industrial activity we pursue to achieve additional comforts at ever lower prices. The laboriousness of producing even the most basic material from the ground up exposes the fallacy of returning to some romantic ideal of a pre-industrialised time. But at this moment in time when the effects of industry are no longer trivial for the environment, the throwaway toasters of today seem unreasonable.” Twitter hashtag: #toasterSG

WHAT IF…Domestic robots could be self-sufficient? – Carnivorous Domestic Entertainment Robots, 2008 by James Auger & Jimmy Loizeau. Engineered by Alex Zivanovic.
“This project approaches the subject of robots from an alternative perspective. Inspired by methods of survival in nature this series of robots references strategies of adaptation and bio-mimetics in their design. Developed for the home, they avoid the stereotypical forms normally associated with robots and adopt a contemporary fashionable design aesthetic. The robots utilise a microbial fuel cell to power themselves, generating energy from biomass in the form of common household pests. This gives them autonomy and to a degree they become living entities existing in a similar way to an exotic pet such as a snake or a lizard, where we provide living prey and become voyeurs in a synthesized, contrived microcosm.” Twitter Hashtag: #robotsSG

WHAT IF…Jimmy Carter had been re-elected, would the world be greener? – The Golden Institute, 2009 by Sascha Pohflepp
“In an alternate United States set in the 1980s, where Ronald Reagan never happened, the Golden Institute for Energy was the world’s premier think tank for alternative energies. From weather modification and lightning harvesting to using the freeway system as a source of power, the Institute’s ambitions were grand and their impact on American life significant. How might its legacy offer a fresh perspective on our present challenges in regard to the environment?” Twitter hashtag: #goldenSG

WHAT IF…We could evaluate the genetic potential of lovers? – Evidence Dolls, 2005 by Dunne & Raby
“Evidence Dolls consists of one hundred plastic dolls used to provoke discussion amongst a group of young single women about the impact of genetic technology on their lifestyle. How will dating change when DNA analysis can reveal the presence of undesirable genes? Evidence Dolls come in three versions based on penis size (small, medium and large). A black indelible marker is provided to note down any characteristics on the dolls body. Hair, toenail clippings, saliva, and sperm can be stored in the penis drawer.” Twitter hashtag: #evidenceSG

WHAT IF…Robots were designed from an emotional point of view? – Technological Dreams Series: No.1, Robots, 2007 by Dunne & Raby
“It’s a dream that refuses to go away. Robots are destined to play a significant part in our daily lives-not as super smart, functional machines, nor as pseudo life forms, but as technological cohabitants. But how will we interact with them? What new interdependencies and relationships might emerge in relation to different levels of robot intelligence and capability: intimate, subservient, dependent, equal?

Robot 1: This one is very independent. It needs to avoid strong electromagnetic fields as these might cause it to malfunction.Robot 2: This robot is very nervous. It analyses everything with its many eyes. If a person approaches too close it becomes extremely agitated and even hysterical.Robot 3: This robot uses retinal scanning technology to decide who accesses our data. It demands that you stare into its eyes for a long time. It needs to be sure it is you.
Robot 4: This one is very needy. Although extremely smart it is trapped in an underdeveloped body and depends on its owner to move about.” Twitter hashtag #emorobotSG

The exhibition was also interesting to me on a purely visual level. As a designer, occasional film-maker and keen photographer, the imagery both in the exhibition and the staging of the works is really interesting. I took quite a few photographs of the exhibit, which are on Flickr. Lastly, as a user of social media, I was interested to see that visitors to the Science Gallery are able to post their opinions about each of the displays on the social networking site Twitter, via hashtags that accompany the description of each piece.

The exhibition is free (although a small donation is requested in order to cover costs for running these exhibitions in the Science Gallery) and open to the public until December 13th 2009. Further details are at the end of this post and on the Science Gallery’s website.

Refresh Dublin – running in conjunction with the ‘What If’ exhibition:

I am delighted to announce that the first Refresh Dublin event will be held in the Science Gallery on Thursday October 29th, running in conjunction with the ‘What If’ exhibition. More information on Refresh Dublin is available on the website: http://www.refreshdublin.org. The speaker line-up for the first event will be announced next week. You can sign-up for updates via the website, follow us on Twitter or join the Facebook group.

—-

08:10:09-13:12:09

WHAT IF…
FUTURE FORM, FUTURE FUNCTION?
Science Gallery,
Dublin.
Website

“WHAT IF…insects could diagnose illness? WHAT IF…clouds were modified to snow ice cream? WHAT IF… we lived in a society where our every thought was public? These are just some of the questions asked in the upcoming exhibition at Science Gallery which probes the space between reality and the impossible and where designers meet scientists to explore the future.

WHAT IF… has been curated by leading London based design duo Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby and features a range of works by designers who have explored everything from using animals as life support machines, through to what happens in a society where machines can read your every emotion.

On show in the gallery will be a diverse range of work including The Race by Michael Burton which looks at how people and their non-human cells can coexists and scrutinizes our inadvertent creation of superbugs like mRSA through the misuse of antibiotics and James King’s Dressing the Meat of Tomorrow looks at recent advances in tissue engineering which enable us to grow meat without the expense, cruelty and traditions of rearing the whole animal.
We want your comments and thoughts on the pieces on show. Each individual exhibit has its own Twitter hashtag – if you comment on this exhibition please use this hashtag.”

  |   Tweet this!   |   Digg it!   |   Del.icio.us   |   reddit   |   Stumble it!   |   E-mail it   |   Subscribe via RSS or via Email.
This entry was posted on Thursday, October 8th, 2009 at 11:03 am and is filed under Art & Technology, Design, Film, Photography & Cinematography, Social Media, User Experience. You can keep updated on the conversation by subscribing to the comments feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.